Wellcome

The naturalistic fallacy / edited by Neil Sinclair.

Contributor(s): Sinclair, Neil (Assistant professor of philosophy) [editor.]Material type: TextTextSeries: Classic philosophical argumentsPublisher: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2019Description: 1 online resource (x, 285 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)Content type: text Media type: computer Carrier type: online resourceISBN: 9781316717578 (ebook)Subject(s): Moore, G. E. (George Edward), 1873-1958 -- Ethics | Ethics | Naturalistic fallacyAdditional physical formats: Print version: : No titleDDC classification: 170/.42 LOC classification: B1647.M74 | N38 2019Online resources: Click here to access online
Contents:
The naturalistic fallacy and the history of metaethics / Neil Sinclair -- The naturalistic fallacy : what it is, and what it isn't / Fred Feldman -- The context and origin of Moore's formulation of the naturalistic fallacy in Principia Ethica / Consuelo Preti -- No-ought-from-is, the naturalistic fallacy and the fact/value distinction: the history of a mistake / Charles Pigden -- Evolution and the naturalistic fallacy / Michael Ruse -- Motivation, recommendation, non-cognitivism and the naturalistic fallacy / Mark van Roojen -- Open question arguments and the irreducibility of ethical normativity / William J. FitzPatrick -- Should analytical descriptivists worry about the naturalistic fallacy? / Susana Nuccetelli -- Normativity and the naturalistic fallacy / Connie S. Rosati -- The naturalistic fallacy and theological ethics / Christian B. Miller -- The phenomenology of moral deliberation and the non-naturalistic fallacy / Terry Horgan and Mark Timmons -- Epistemic relativism and the naturalistic fallacy / J. Adam Carter.
Summary: At the turn of the twentieth century, G. E. Moore contemptuously dismissed most previous 'ethical systems' for committing the 'Naturalistic Fallacy'. This fallacy - which has been variously understood, but has almost always been seen as something to avoid - was perhaps the greatest structuring force on subsequent ethical theorising. To a large extent, to understand the Fallacy is to understand contemporary ethics. This volume aims to provide that understanding. Its thematic chapters - written by a range of distinguished contributors - introduce the history, text and philosophy behind Moore's charge of fallacy and its supporting 'open question' argument. They detail how the fallacy influenced multiple traditions in ethics (including evolutionary, religious and naturalistic approaches), its connections to supposed dichotomies between 'is'/'ought' and facts/values, and its continuing relevance to our understanding of normativity. Together, the chapters provide a historical and opinionated introduction to contemporary ethics that will be essential for students, teachers and researchers.
Item type:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Status Date due Barcode
Ebooks Ebooks Mysore University Main Library
Not for loan EBCU454

Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 15 Nov 2018).

The naturalistic fallacy and the history of metaethics / Neil Sinclair -- The naturalistic fallacy : what it is, and what it isn't / Fred Feldman -- The context and origin of Moore's formulation of the naturalistic fallacy in Principia Ethica / Consuelo Preti -- No-ought-from-is, the naturalistic fallacy and the fact/value distinction: the history of a mistake / Charles Pigden -- Evolution and the naturalistic fallacy / Michael Ruse -- Motivation, recommendation, non-cognitivism and the naturalistic fallacy / Mark van Roojen -- Open question arguments and the irreducibility of ethical normativity / William J. FitzPatrick -- Should analytical descriptivists worry about the naturalistic fallacy? / Susana Nuccetelli -- Normativity and the naturalistic fallacy / Connie S. Rosati -- The naturalistic fallacy and theological ethics / Christian B. Miller -- The phenomenology of moral deliberation and the non-naturalistic fallacy / Terry Horgan and Mark Timmons -- Epistemic relativism and the naturalistic fallacy / J. Adam Carter.

At the turn of the twentieth century, G. E. Moore contemptuously dismissed most previous 'ethical systems' for committing the 'Naturalistic Fallacy'. This fallacy - which has been variously understood, but has almost always been seen as something to avoid - was perhaps the greatest structuring force on subsequent ethical theorising. To a large extent, to understand the Fallacy is to understand contemporary ethics. This volume aims to provide that understanding. Its thematic chapters - written by a range of distinguished contributors - introduce the history, text and philosophy behind Moore's charge of fallacy and its supporting 'open question' argument. They detail how the fallacy influenced multiple traditions in ethics (including evolutionary, religious and naturalistic approaches), its connections to supposed dichotomies between 'is'/'ought' and facts/values, and its continuing relevance to our understanding of normativity. Together, the chapters provide a historical and opinionated introduction to contemporary ethics that will be essential for students, teachers and researchers.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.
Share

No. of hits (from 9th Mar 12) :

Powered by Koha